Abstract

Maladaptive operant conditioning contributes to development of neuropsychiatric disorders. Candidate genes have been identified that contribute to this maladaptive plasticity, but the neural basis of operant conditioning in genetic model organisms remains poorly understood. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a versatile genetic model organism that readily forms operant associations with punishment stimuli. However, operant conditioning with a food reward has not been demonstrated in flies, limiting the types of neural circuits that can be studied. Here we present the first sucrose-reinforced operant conditioning paradigm for flies. In the paradigm, flies walk along a Y-shaped track with reward locations at the terminus of each hallway. When flies turn in the reinforced direction at the center of the track, they receive a sucrose reward at the end of the hallway. Only flies that rest early in training learn the reward contingency normally. Flies rewarded independently of their behavior do not form a learned association but have the same amount of rest as trained flies, showing that rest is not driven by learning. Optogenetically-induced sleep does not promote learning, indicating that sleep itself is not sufficient for learning the operant task. We validated the sensitivity of this assay to detect the effect of genetic manipulations by testing the classic learning mutant dunce. Dunce flies are learning-impaired in the Y-Track task, indicating a likely role for cAMP in the operant coincidence detector. This novel training paradigm will provide valuable insight into the molecular mechanisms of disease and the link between sleep and learning.

Highlights

  • Learning is a broadly conserved, highly regulated, and health relevant function of the nervous system

  • The mean Preference Index (PI) of drowsy Wild type (WT) flies is greater than the mean PI of restless WT files (Two-sample bootstrap test; p = 0.035)

  • While cyclic adenosine monophosphate is important for the formation of classical conditioning (Zars et al, 2000), a previous study found that activity-regulated cAMP synthesis is not necessary for the formation of aversive operant conditioning (Brembs and Plendl, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Learning is a broadly conserved, highly regulated, and health relevant function of the nervous system. Operant conditioning to reward or relief from punishment incorporates a positive feedback loop—learning increases the generation of the behavior, which in turn increases reward frequency, which strengthens the learned association. This type of positive feedback loop is hypothesized to contribute to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders including childhood anxiety, compulsive behaviors, and chronic pain (Ollendick et al, 2001; Korff and Harvey, 2006; Chóliz, 2010; Gatzounis et al, 2012). It is not currently possible to make a cellular-resolution map of the neurons necessary for operant conditioning in animals more complex than Aplysia californica (Nargeot and Simmers, 2011), nor has there been a genetic screen for molecular components of operant learning in model organisms. A draft map of the neural connections in a fruit fly hemi-brain has been recently published which, along with advanced genetic tools, greatly facilitates mapping complex neural circuits (Pfeiffer et al, 2010; Scheffer et al, 2020)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call