Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate a measure of the responsiveness and reliability of the pulse volume recording upstroke ratio (PVRr). A database of 389 subjects undergoing lower extremity revascularization was analyzed. Subjects were included in the analysis if they had undergone pedal radiographs, had PVRs performed pre- and postlower extremity revascularization, and had regular pulsatile digital waveforms with a pressure recording on both PVRs. The responsiveness of the PVRr was assessed by means of the postoperative percent change in comparison to the digital pressures. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed (Pearson -0.421; p = .007) indicating that as digital pressures increased, the PVRr decreased. Further, measurement of the reliability of the PVRr was performed on a selection of 10 recordings by 2 residents and 3 board-certified surgeons. The observed intraclass correlation coefficient of measurements was 0.960. Results of this investigation provide evidence in support of the responsiveness and inter-rater reliability in the calculation of the pulse volume recording upstroke ratio.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
