Abstract
Many doctors consider wheezing infants and young children who respond to beta-adrenergic agents to be asthmatics, or at least at risk for later asthma. The aim of this study was to compare responses to inhaled albuterol and racemic epinephrine in infancy between children with and without asthma later in childhood. In a crossover study setting, 100 acutely wheezing infants aged less than 24 months were randomized to receive inhalations of either racemic epinephrine and placebo, or albuterol and placebo. Clinical evaluation consisted of measurements of respiratory rate, heart rate, and oxygen saturation, and clinical assessment of the respiratory distress assessment instrument (RDAI) score, consisting of wheezing and chest indrawings. The asthma status of the children was evaluated at three clinical follow-up visits, at 4.0, 7.2, and 12.3 (median) years of age. Responses to bronchodilating agents, when respiratory rates and RDAI scores were used as outcome measures, were not different in future asthmatics compared to nonasthmatics. However, oxygen saturation was significantly higher after albuterol inhalation in children who had asthma at all three visits (92.67% confidence interval (CI), 91.39-93.96) than in those without asthma at these visits (92.52% CI, 91.79-93.25), but lower, correspondingly, after racemic epinephrine (91.97% CI, 90.74-93.19 vs. 93.04% CI, 92.29-93.79) and placebo (91.38% CI, 90.49-92.28 vs. 93.12% CI, 92.60-93.65) inhalations (P = 0.04). In conclusion, we were not able to confirm that future asthmatics respond better than future nonasthmatics to bronchodilating agents during wheezing in infancy. More studies are needed to characterize the subset of infants who benefit from bronchodilating treatment in infancy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.