Abstract
The responses of individuals of the crayfish Orconectes virilis to the same set of chemical cues were tested under flow (lotic) and non-flow (lentic) conditions. The cues presented to the crayfish were food cues, alarm |$\left( { = {\rm{ crushed \,\,conspecifics}}} \right)$| cues, and the combination of |${\rm{food \,\,+\,\, alarm}}$| cues. Crayfish behavior (time in burrows) and posture (lowered posture) were significantly affected by the odor treatment, the flow environment, and an interaction of treatment and environment. While the general patterns of responses to odors (more time spent feeding when food cues were introduced, and more time spent in lowered posture and in burrow when alarm cues were introduced) were qualitatively similar in the two environments, responses were stronger (especially to food odors) in the environment with flow. However, the different strength of these responses seemed not to be related to the directional information provided by the flow but rather was probably the effect of a difference in crayfish behavior between lentic and lotic environments in the control (no added chemical cues). In flow, crayfish spent less time executing feeding movements and more time in the lowered posture and in the burrow than in no-flow conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Crustacean Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.