Abstract

Constructed wetlands (CWs) have been used to remove organic pollutants including antibiotics based on the roles of plants and microbial communities, but how rhizosphere and bulk substrate-associated microbiomes respond to antibiotics during biodegradation have seldom been researched. The effects of sulfonamides (SAs) on the microbiome composition in different compartments, namely rhizosphere, near rhizosphere and bulk substrate, in CWs planted with either Cyperus alternifolius, Cyperus papyrus or Juncus effuses were evaluated using specially designed rhizoboxes and 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing. Results revealed that wastewater-borne SAs significantly reduced the microbial biodiversity in CWs, and inhibited the functional bacterial groups related to sulphur and nitrogen cycles. On the contrary, SAs significantly enriched methylotrophs with potential to initially biodegrade SAs, such as Methylosinus, Methylotenera, Methylocaldum and Methylomonas, and such enrichment was more significant in rhizosphere than in bulk substrate. The network analysis indicated that a more complex network in bulk substrate was more fragile to SA stress. The presence of wetland plants significantly influenced the bacterial community structure in CWs, but in the same compartment, the difference among the three plants species was not obvious. Wetland plants ensured the stability of rhizosphere microorganisms and increased their ability to tolerate SA stress. The present study enhances our understanding of the importance of plant-bacteria interactions in CWs and responses of substrate microbiome to antibiotics.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call