Abstract

Most famously at the World Trade Organization (WTO) meetings in Seattle, meetings of global governance bodies have been the sites of large assemblies critical of perceived global injustices. People who gather outside such meetings often do so in political yet convivial and festive ways as they engage in a process of creating insurgent civic spaces. However, local, regional and national pressures, and the international state actors that host these meetings, have engineered the effective elimination of proximate civic spaces for social protest. The cases of the WTO in Seattle, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Honolulu and the G8 summit in Kananaskis illustrate trends of militarisation, radicalisation, routinisation and dislocation. In hosting such events, state actors should move towards facilitating an active citizenry on a more regular basis, which requires more favourable attention to the need for open civic spaces near world governance events. Such a move will require pressure from non-state, non-cor...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.