Abstract
In the present issue of Scripta Materialia , Holm et al. comment on a paper previously published by the present authors (J. Zhou, and V. Mohles, Acta Materialia 59, 5997 (2011)), in which we presented molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of grain boundary (GB) motion with a new method to derive GB mobility. The GB mobilities derived from these simulations contradicted previous MD simulations, but were in reasonable agreement with our experimental findings. In their comment, Holm et al. aim to disprove our new method. However, they utilize a simplistic model and use misinterpreted data from our paper for their alleged proof and conclusions. The present paper points out where Holm et al. err.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
