Abstract

Reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) in maize (Zea mays L.) is used to develop populations with superior combining ability, and it is usually assumed that these populations must be genetically distinct for RRS to be effective. Starting from two randomly derived subpopulations, GG(A) and GG(B), of the open‐pollinated maize population ‘Golden Glow’ (GGC0), we conducted six cycles of full‐sib RRS for grain yield and moisture. Our objectives were to (i) document selection response; (ii) evaluate inter and intrapopulation genetic diversity; and (iii) review selection response relative to gene action, heterosis, inbreeding, and genetic drift. We performed a generation means analysis (GMA) using GG(A), GG(B), and a third population of Golden Glow developed by 21 cycles of mass selection for prolificacy, GG(MP). Field performance was evaluated at four environments in Wisconsin. We analyzed allele frequency changes using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs). Selection response for grain yield of GG(A) × GG(B) population crosses was 5.3 g plant−1 cycle−1 Grain moisture and root lodging decreased by −0.5% cycle−1 and −5.2% cycle−1, while prolificacy increased by 0.03 ears cycle−1 After six cycles of RRS, GG(A) and GG(B) diverged genetically from each other, as well as from GG(MP)C21 and Golden Glow. Gene diversity within GG(A) and GG(B) decreased. However, total gene diversity over both GG(A) and GG(B) did not change over cycles of RRS. Genetic drift did not appear to seriously impede selection response. Most of the selection response, regardless of trait, selection method, or subpopulation, was attributed to additive genetic effects.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call