Response to Matsusaka: Estimating the Effect of Ballot Initiatives on Policy Responsiveness

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessResearch NotesResponse to Matsusaka: Estimating the Effect of Ballot Initiatives on Policy ResponsivenessMichael G. Hagen, Edward L. Lascher, Jr., and John F. CamobrecoMichael G. Hagen Search for more articles by this author , Edward L. Lascher, Jr. Search for more articles by this author , and John F. Camobreco Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 63, Number 4Nov., 2001 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00110 Views: 43Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 2001 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Gook Jin Kim, Suk Joon Hwang, Frances S. Berry Explaining the strictness of medical marijuanaregulations in states, The Social Science Journal 58, no.22 (Feb 2020): 186–205.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.04.003Arjun Vishwanath Electoral Institutions and Substantive Representation in Local Politics: The Effects of Ranked Choice Voting, SSRN Electronic Journal 105 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3802566Arndt Leininger Direct Democracy in Europe: Potentials and Pitfalls, Global Policy 6 (Jun 2015): 17–27.https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12224Patrick Flavin Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States, American Politics Research 40, no.11 (Aug 2011): 29–59.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X11416920R. Y. Shapiro Public Opinion and American Democracy, Public Opinion Quarterly 75, no.55 (Dec 2011): 982–1017.https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr053John D. Griffin, Patrick Flavin How Citizens and Their Legislators Prioritize Spheres of Representation, Political Research Quarterly 64, no.33 (Aug 2010): 520–533.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910373552Simon Hug Policy consequences of direct legislation theory, empirical models and evidence, Quality & Quantity 45, no.33 (Mar 2010): 559–578.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9313-0Gregory B Lewis, Charles W Gossett Why Did Californians Pass Proposition 8? Stability and Change in Public Support for Same-Sex Marriage, California Journal of Politics and Policy 3, no.11 (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-4370.1130Joshua J. Dyck, Edward L. Lascher Direct Democracy and Political Efficacy Reconsidered, Political Behavior 31, no.33 (Dec 2008): 401–427.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9081-xJames Monogan, Virginia Gray, David Lowery Public Opinion, Organized Interests, and Policy Congruence in Initiative and Noninitiative U.S. States, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9, no.33 (Jan 2021): 304–324.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000900900303D. M. Daley, D. P. Haider-Markel, A. B. Whitford Checks, Balances, and the Cost of Regulation: Evidence from the American States, Political Research Quarterly 60, no.44 (Sep 2007): 696–706.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907307517Kevin Arceneaux, Gregory A. Huber What to Do (and Not Do) with Multicollinearity in State Politics Research, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7, no.11 (Jan 2021): 81–101.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000700700105Melissa J. Marschall, Anirudh V.S. Ruhil Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative Reconsidered: Addressing Endogeneity, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, no.44 (Aug 2016): 327–355.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000500500401Melissa J. Marschall, Anirudh V.S. Ruhil Of Models and Methods: A Response to Matsusaka, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, no.44 (Aug 2016): 364–372.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000500500403Michael S. Kang , Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 4, no.33 ( 2005): 217.https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2005.4.217Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives Are Created Equal, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4, no.33 (Aug 2016): 345–363.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000400400305Daniel A. Smith, Joseph Lubinski Direct Democracy During the Progressive Era: A Crack in the Populist Veneer?, Journal of Policy History 14, no.44 (Apr 2009): 349–383.https://doi.org/10.1353/jph.2002.0026Kevin Arceneaux Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2, no.44 (Jan 2021): 372–387.https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200403