Abstract
The study aims at comparing the environmental performances of the indirect heat exchanger and the ohmic heater for foodstuff decontamination. By means of a Life Cycle Assessment, adopting ReCiPe 2016 midpoint (H) method, applied to the sterilization of diced tomatoes and to the pasteurization of diced peaches for a standard company respectively in Italy and in Australia, it emerged that environmental impact of ohmic heating is higher than the indirect one. Having the ohmic heater the electric energy as the main contributor, a sensitivity analysis is added to investigate the impact of the mix of primary sources. Relevant savings in global warming potential are achieved when the French energy mix is used (77.1% on tomatoes and 87.7% on peaches) or when 100% of the energy source comes from photovoltaic panels (79.7% and 88.5% respectively). Finally, the combined use of the two technologies has been investigated, resulting to be an intermediate solution compared to the others.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
