Abstract
This article is a response to the comments, in the symposium on Artefacts of Legal Inquiry (2020), of Desmond Manderson and Emily Kidd White. In response to those comments, the article addresses four themes: (1) writing and reading theory; (2) the politics of legal language and legal reasoning; (3) the ethics of legal reasoning and the value of imagining; and 4) relating law, history and power.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
