Abstract
We thank you for your comments and are pleased to know our article was well received. We would like to make clear that there was no separation of urethra and vagina but mobilisation of the urogenital complex. This may be semantic. Commentary to Partial Urogenital Mobilization in Cloacal Malformation: is it a viable option?Journal of Pediatric UrologyPreviewThis study reports outcomes of a cohort of 10 patients with short (<3cm) common channel cloacal malformations (CM) who underwent partial urogenital sinus mobilization (PUM).1 The authors emphasize the utility of PUM in patients with short common channels, specifically noting that PUM has good continence outcomes with appropriate separation of the urethra and vagina at a median of five-year follow-up. Full-Text PDF
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
