Abstract

Unlike other intracellular bacteria, Wolbachia genomes are highly labile largely due to the presence of repetitive sequences such as transposons, active phage and high rates of recombination [1–3]. Within the wMelPop genome a locus of considerable instability, referred to as the Octomom locus, has been described by several studies [4–8]. As this locus is one of the few variable loci between wMel (single Octomom locus, low bacterial density and non-pathogenic) and wMelPop (3–12 Octomom loci, high bacterial density and pathogenic) genomes, and no genetic transformation tools are available, there is considerable interest in understanding the link between genotype and phenotype. Chrostek and Teixeira hypothesized “that Octomom region amplification underlies wMelPop virulence” and went on to correlate increased Octomom copy number to increased bacterial density within the host and strength of pathology [5]. Absent from this study was a systematic assessment of temperature, which previous studies had shown to affect wMelPop pathology, and its effect on wMelPop density and Octomom copy number. We hypothesized that temperature would affect Octomom copy number and/or gene expression, and that such changes would affect the strength of pathology [8]. Our study showed that while Octomom copy number did vary over developmental time, no consistent trend was observed among Octomom copy number, bacterial density nor pathology [8]. We determined that temperature, not Octomom copy number or bacterial density, had the greatest effect on wMelPop infected host lifespan. The link between Octomom copy number and pathology was further challenged by our discovery of a pathogenic Wolbachia strain (wMel3562) that maintained a single copy of the Octomom locus, and supports an earlier study of a wMelPop variant that lacks the Octomom locus but which is still pathogenic [7–9]. These observations suggest that at the very least, genetic elements beyond the Octomom locus are responsible for pathology...

Highlights

  • Our study showed that while Octomom copy number did vary over developmental time, no consistent trend was observed among Octomom copy number, bacterial density nor pathology [8]

  • The link between Octomom copy number and pathology was further challenged by our discovery of a pathogenic Wolbachia strain that maintained a single copy of the Octomom locus, and supports an earlier study of a wMelPop variant that lacks the Octomom locus but which is still pathogenic [7,8,9]

  • We showed that neither the rate or density of wMelPop had an effect on pathogenicity

Read more

Summary

FORMAL COMMENT

Response to: Comment on Rohrscheib et al 2016 "Intensity of mutualism breakdown is determined by temperature not amplification of Wolbachia genes".

OPEN ACCESS
Supporting information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call