Abstract
The five points of criticism in Wesolowski's comment can be separated into three categories. Two issues are related to the question whether the nonadditive kinetic-energy functional or its functional derivative should be investigated, which is a matter of personal choice of research subject. Another issue is an unfounded accusation addressing the numerical soundness of our data. Finally, the remaining two points do not concern our paper, but deal with connections between previous work by two of us [J. Chem. Phys. 126, 234116 (2007)] and by Wesolowski and co-workers [J. Chem. Phys.129, 074107 (2008)], which we clarify in this response. Issues from all three categories have in common that they do not question the usefulness of our paper, or criticize any of our results or conclusions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
