Abstract
Rocholl et al. (2018) claim that the 40Ar/39Ar age of 14.808 ± [0.038] Ma (2σ; full external error) for the Ries impact, recently obtained from step-heating analysis of tektites (Schmieder et al., 2018, Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 220, 146–157), is “geologically impossible” and violates paleomagnetic constraints. We demonstrate that the moldavite age of Schmieder et al. (2018) is in good agreement with recalculated isotopic ages for ash layers and magnetic (sub-)chrons that define the Langhian stage in the Astronomically Tuned Neogene Time Scale, using updated K decay constants and monitor ages in 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. Moreover, we stress that the normally magnetized basal pelitic sediments of the Ries crater lake, which are separated from the reversely magnetized suevite by a thick unit of post-impact conglomerates and sandstones, may not have been deposited ‘immediately’ after the impact. The paleomagnetic constraints proposed by Pohl (1977, 1978) and Rocholl et al. (2018) are, therefore, questionable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
