Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate response shift, the recalibration of perceived quality of life (QoL) relative to symptomatic changes in Parkinson disease (PD). BackgroundHealth-related QoL in PD is influenced by improvement vs. decline in disease severity. However, it is unclear how disease course changes internal standards of QoL over time. Methods124 PD patients were subdivided based on Total UPDRS change over 1 year (stable, improved, declined). The EuroQol Visual Analog Scale assessed QoL at baseline (T1) and 1 year later (T2). At T2, patients rated current QoL (T2-current) and reappraised their T1 QoL (T2-retrospective). Recalibration response shifts were represented by the difference between T1 and T2-retrospective QoL ratings. ResultsAt follow-up (T2), the total patient sample reported no difference between current (T2 current mean (M) = 76.3) and retrospective (T2-R M = 77.8) QoL ratings. While there was no significant difference between T1 (M = 79.2) and T2-R ratings 1 year later (M = 77.8) for the total sample, there was a change by group interaction (p < 0.005) which showed that retrospectively, decliners reduced ratings (M Δ = −9.0) and improvers increased ratings (M Δ = +6.4) while stable patients did not change. ConclusionsWhen PD patients consider their health status one year ago, decliners recalibrate and downgrade last year's health assessment, while improvers upgrade last year's assessment. Changes in internal calibrations cushion periods of decline or improvement in PD such that patients tend to “stabilize” their general disease course when recalling symptom trajectory, providing insight into the process of adaptation to the effects of disease progression and treatment over time.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.