Abstract
In Experiment 1, rats were exposed to progressive‐ratio schedules of food reinforcement while other rats were exposed simultaneously to yoked‐interval schedules that arranged equivalent interreinforcer intervals but required only a single response at the end of the interval for food delivery. In Experiment 2, a within‐subject yoked‐control procedure was employed in which pigeons were exposed to alternating sessions (one per day) of progressive‐ratio schedules and yoked‐interval schedules as described above. In both experiments, responding under the yoked‐interval schedule persisted beyond the point at which responding under the progressive‐ratio schedule had ceased. The progressive‐ratio schedules controlled break‐and‐run distributions, and the yoked‐interval schedules controlled more even distributions of responses in time. Response rates decreased and postreinforcement pauses increased over time within individual sessions under both schedules. The results suggest that responding maintained by interval schedules is more persistent than that maintained by ratio schedules. The limitations and implications of this conclusion are discussed in the context of other investigations of response strength and behavioral momentum.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
