Abstract

Anthropogenic structures (e.g. weirs and dams) fragment river networks and restrict the movement of migratory fish. Poor understanding of behavioural response to hydrodynamic cues at structures currently limits the development of effective barrier mitigation measures. This study aimed to assess the effect of flow constriction and associated flow patterns on eel behaviour during downstream migration. In a field experiment, we tracked the movements of 40 tagged adult European eels (Anguilla anguilla) through the forebay of a redundant hydropower intake under two manipulated hydrodynamic treatments. Interrogation of fish trajectories in relation to measured and modelled water velocities provided new insights into behaviour, fundamental for developing passage technologies for this endangered species. Eels rarely followed direct routes through the site. Initially, fish aligned with streamlines near the channel banks and approached the intake semi-passively. A switch to more energetically costly avoidance behaviours occurred on encountering constricted flow, prior to physical contact with structures. Under high water velocity gradients, fish then tended to escape rapidly back upstream, whereas exploratory ‘search’ behaviour was common when acceleration was low. This study highlights the importance of hydrodynamics in informing eel behaviour. This offers potential to develop behavioural guidance, improve fish passage solutions and enhance traditional physical screening.

Highlights

  • Freshwater ecosystems are the most anthropogenically impacted, in part due to a loss of connectivity caused by infrastructure such as weirs, dams and other impediments [1,2,3]

  • The remaining 37 individuals passed through the redundant hydropower (RHP) intake

  • Manipulation of flow fields clearly influenced the behaviour of downstream-moving adult eels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Freshwater ecosystems are the most anthropogenically impacted, in part due to a loss of connectivity caused by infrastructure such as weirs, dams and other impediments [1,2,3]. Physical barriers obstruct dispersal and migration between habitats required for different ontogenetic stages, and disrupt the life cycle [6,7] River infrastructure, such as hydropower and pumping facilities, can cause direct injury and mortality to fish that pass through them due to blade strike, cavitation and grinding [8,9]. The development of effective fish passage depends on fundamental knowledge of swimming capabilities, which has received much attention [14], with a historical bias towards salmonids [15,16] This must be combined with an understanding of behavioural response to environmental stimuli [4,17], both those that attract and repel fish [18]. This knowledge is currently lacking for many species [12,18] and there is insufficient understanding of the

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.