Abstract

AbstractRespiration and photosynthesis were studied in two Nothofagus species with different drought tolerance in order to evaluate the effect of water deficit on foliar carbon balance and the possible role of the alternative pathway on respiratory adjustment. We propose that under severe water deficit the more drought‐tolerant species N. dombeyi is able to decrease its respiration more than the less drought‐tolerant species N. nitida, thus carbon gain could be maintained when photosynthesis is suppressed by drought. Dark respiration (Rd) and carbon assimilation under saturating light (Asat) were evaluated under seasonal field conditions and during drying and re‐watering cycles under glasshouse. In addition, respiratory pathway changes were evaluated by oxygen isotope fractionation. In the field, N. dombeyi displayed greater light‐saturated photosynthetic capacity than N. nitida, but Rd did not differ between species during summer. In the glasshouse, N. dombeyi displayed an unchanged rate of Rd and increased carbon loss under severe water deficit. Nothofagus nitida displayed a more flexible respiratory response to water deficit, with a lower thermal sensitivity of respiration (decrease in Q10) and a decrease in Rd. This contributed to maintaining leaf carbon balance during the water deficit period. Respiratory electron flow was mainly via the cytochrome pathway for both species and under all treatments, indicating no strong participation of alternative respiration. Our results suggest that under severe water stress, N. dombeyi could be more injured than N. nitida and that the lack of control in the carbon loss under prolonged periods of drought could be limiting for its survival.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.