Abstract

When facing two sets of imprinting objects of different numerousness, domestic chicks prefer to approach the larger one. Given that choice for familiar and novel stimuli in imprinting situations is known to be affected by the sex of the animals, we investigated how male and female domestic chicks divide the time spent in the proximity of a familiar versus an unfamiliar number of objects, and how animals interact (by pecking) with these objects. We confirmed that chicks discriminate among the different numerousnesses, but we also showed that females and males behave differently, depending on the degree of familiarity of the objects. When objects in the testing sets were all familiar, females equally explored both sets and pecked at all objects individually. Males instead selectively approached the familiar numerousness and pecked more at it. When both testing sets comprised familiar as well as novel objects, both males and females approached the larger numerousness of familiar objects. However, chicks directed all their pecks toward the novel object within the set. Differences in the behavior of males and females can be accounted for in terms of sex difference in the motivation to reinstate social contact with the familiar objects and to explore novel ones, likely associated with the ecology and the social structure of the species before domestication.

Highlights

  • The investigation of numerical cognition in animals has been challenging

  • Spontaneous preference allows for the investigation of relative numerosity judgments (“more than” or “less than”)

  • While foraging, animals from various taxa show a spontaneous preference for more food items (Bogale, Aoyama, & Sugita, 2014; Gazzola, Vallortigara, & PellitteriRosa, 2018; Hauser, Carey, & Hauser, 2000; Hunt, Low, & Burns, 2008; Lucon-Xiccato et al, 2015; Rodríguez et al, 2015; Rugani et al, 2013a, b; Yang & Chiao, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The investigation of numerical cognition in animals has been challenging. Scientists have been taking advantage of spontaneous choice tasks (where the animals are expected to choose the preferred or the most advantageous option) as well as operant conditioning tasks (Nieder, 2019). While foraging, animals from various taxa show a spontaneous preference for more food items (Bogale, Aoyama, & Sugita, 2014; Gazzola, Vallortigara, & PellitteriRosa, 2018; Hauser, Carey, & Hauser, 2000; Hunt, Low, & Burns, 2008; Lucon-Xiccato et al, 2015; Rodríguez et al, 2015; Rugani et al, 2013a, b; Yang & Chiao, 2016). While escaping from predators or looking for sexual partners, fishes prefer to join larger groups of conspecifics (Agrillo, Dadda & Bisazza, 2006; Hager & Helfman, 1991; Mehlis et al, 2015; Potrich et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.