Abstract

Twenty adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairments were given three tests of auditory perception: The CUNY Nonsense Syllable Test (NST), the low predictability items of the Speech in Noise (SPIN) test, and the high predictability items of the SPIN test. The tests were administered at a signal‐to‐noise ratio giving a score of approximately 50%, as determined with an adaptive procedure at the beginning of the study. They were tested on four occasions: (1) at the beginning of the study, (2) after one month of “no treatment,” (3) after a month of intensive auditory training, and (4) after a further month of “no treatment.” During the treatment period, ten of the subjects spent all of the time on global tasks (i.e., activities involving sentence perception and perceptual strategy) while the other 10 spent part of the time on analytic tasks (i.e., activities involving consonant recognition). The results showed: (a) that performance improved only during the treatment period, and (b) that the i...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.