Response latency in Canis familiaris: mental ability or mental strategy?

Abstract

Animal studies of cognitive aging typically use measures of response accuracy (RA) to evaluate cognitive function, which declines with age. Human aging studies, by contrast, frequently measure response latency (RL), with faster responses being indicative of superior performance. To examine the influence of age on RL in an animal model, the authors assessed RA with RL in young and aged beagle dogs (Canis familiaris) tested on a 3-component delayed nonmatching-to-position task, which comprised 3 subtests. Young dogs displayed significantly slower RLs and higher RAs and showed RL slowing with greater complexity, compared with aged dogs. In addition, the slower responding young dogs made fewer errors. Thus, RL appears to reflect the learning strategy applied, rather than the level of mental ability.