Abstract
Roelofs, Piai, and Schriefers discuss a series of results obtained from various word reading tasks in the context of word and picture distractors. They argue that these results support WEAVER++, a computational model of word production that assumes a competitive lexical selection mechanism, and challenge the response exclusion hypothesis, a model that assumes a non-competitive lexical selection mechanism. At odds with this claim, I argue here that these data do not pose problems for the response exclusion hypothesis. I also discuss new avenues of research to advance the debate on the mechanism of lexical selection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
