Abstract

Elementary and special education students received training on a variable-ratio reinforcement schedule and were then switched to one of three response-elimination procedures: extinction training, omission training, or gradual omission training. Omission training eliminated responding more effectively than did extinction training; however, the gradual omission training procedure reduced responding more rapidly and efficiently than did either omission training or extinction training. These results occurred in both subject populations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call