Abstract
Rats are most frequently used to fulfill ICH S7A requirements for respiratory safety pharmacology. We hypothesized that the models used to assess respiratory safety pharmacology present different ventilatory responses to bronchoconstriction, bronchodilation and respiratory depression. Respiratory monitoring was performed with head-out plethysmographs for rats, masks for dogs and bias airflow helmets for monkeys. Respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (TV) and minute volume (MV) were recorded. Forty rats, 18 dogs and 8 monkeys were acclimated to the respiratory monitoring equipment. Animals received saline (IV), albuterol (inhalation), methacholine (IV) and remifentanil (IV). Albuterol increased TV in all species. Methacholine decreased TV and MV in monkeys. In dogs, methacholine increased TV, RR and MV. In rats, methacholine increased TV and decreased RR. Remifentanil induced central respiratory depression in all species with decreased MV, except in rats. Dogs presented a biphasic response to remifentanil with hypoventilation followed by delayed hyperventilation. The monkeys presented similar responses to humans which may be due to biologic similarities. Dogs and rats presented clinically significant ventilatory alterations following positive control drugs. Although, the response to bronchoconstriction in dogs and rats was different from humans, the two species presented ventilatory changes that highlight the potential adverse effect of test articles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
