Abstract

BackgroundAccurate blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on the reliability of oscillometric cuff pressure pulses (OscP) and Korotkoff sounds (KorS) for automated oscillometric and manual techniques. It has been widely accepted that respiration is one of the main factors affecting BP measurement. However, little is known about how respiration affects the signals from which BP measurement is obtained. The aim was to quantify the modulation effect of respiration on oscillometric pulses and KorS during clinical BP measurement.MethodsSystolic and diastolic BPs were measured manually from 40 healthy subjects (from 23 to 65 years old) under normal and regular deep breathing. The following signals were digitally recorded during linear cuff deflation: chest motion from a magnetometer to obtain reference respiration, cuff pressure from an electronic pressure sensor to derive OscP, and KorS from a digital stethoscope. The effects of respiration on both OscP and KorS were determined from changes in their amplitude associated with respiration between systole and diastole. These changes were normalized to the mean signal amplitude of OscP and KorS to derive the respiratory modulation depth. Reference respiration frequency, and the frequencies derived from the amplitude modulation of OscP and KorS were also calculated and compared.ResultsRespiratory modulation depth was 14 and 40 % for OscP and KorS respectively under normal breathing condition, with significant increases (both p < 0.05) to 16 and 49 % with deeper breathing. There was no statistically significant difference between the reference respiration frequency and those derived from the oscillometric and Korotkoff signals (both p > 0.05) during deep breathing, and for the oscillometric signal during normal breathing (p > 0.05).ConclusionsOur study confirmed and quantified the respiratory modulation effect on the oscillometric pulses and KorS during clinical BP measurement, with increased modulation depth under regular deeper breathing.

Highlights

  • Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on the reliability of oscillometric cuff pressure pulses (OscP) and Korotkoff sounds (KorS) for automated oscillometric and manual techniques

  • The manual auscultatory method is based on the auscultation of Korotkoff sound (KorS), while the automated oscillometric method is based on the analysis of oscillometric cuff pressure pulses (OscP)

  • Our study showed that the amplitude modulation depths of respiration on OscP and KorS were significantly higher under deep breathing condition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on the reliability of oscillometric cuff pressure pulses (OscP) and Korotkoff sounds (KorS) for automated oscillometric and manual techniques. The aim was to quantify the modulation effect of respiration on oscillometric pulses and KorS during clinical BP measurement. Manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods are non-invasive ways usually used for blood pressures (BP) measurement. The manual auscultatory method is based on the auscultation of Korotkoff sound (KorS), while the automated oscillometric method is based on the analysis of oscillometric cuff pressure pulses (OscP). The reliability of OscP and KorS signals are important for accurate BP measurement for both manual and automated methods. Published studies have shown that respiration influences both systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) [1,2,3,4,5]. It is clinically important to understand the effect of respiration on OscP and KorS

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call