Abstract
Typically, we think that blameworthiness is tied to normative failure. To be susceptible to blame for an act, attitude, or trait it must be that this target of blame entailed some sort of mistake: bad, wrong, or unjustified action on the part of the agent. In this paper, I challenge this common presumption. Instead, I suggest that blameworthiness needn’t be a result of normative failure or a failure to maintain normative justification, but can also be a result of failures to conform to the standards that govern particular practices in which one is engaged, whether or not engagement in that practice, or indeed the norms that structure it, help to determine how one ought to live.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
