Abstract

BackgroundRespectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns.MethodsAt one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017–July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health – ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth – as possible predictors for reporting poor care.ResultsAmong 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (β = 0.23, p-value < 0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (β = − 0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (β = − 0.42; p-value < 0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01–0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births.ConclusionsMeasurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women’s age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.

Highlights

  • Respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns

  • Evidence shows that women who were mistreated during labour and birth are hesitant to engage with postnatal services, irrespective of whether provision of care is in accordance with clinical guidelines [8, 10, 11]

  • We focus on exit survey-reported respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) at one EN-BIRTH study site in Nepal, with three objectives: 1. Analyse EXIT SURVEY-REPORTED EXPERIENCE OF CARE FOR WOMEN after hospital birth

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. Almost 80 million babies are born in health facilities [1], a 50% increase in the last 20 years especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [2]. This is a major result of key investments to bring global attention to improving women’s health [3], with an additional 3 million maternal and neonatal deaths estimated to have been averted in 2018 [4]. Evidence shows that women who were mistreated during labour and birth are hesitant to engage with postnatal services, irrespective of whether provision of care is in accordance with clinical guidelines [8, 10, 11]. The White Ribbon Alliance’s (WRA) Respectful Maternity Care Charter outlines the rights of women and newborns during childbirth and the postnatal period [20], but there is very limited evidence regarding how to measure such inclusive respectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) in practice

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.