Resource use and clinical outcomes in blunt thoracic injury: a 10-year trauma registry comparison between southern Finland and Germany.

Abstract

Serious thoracic injuries are associated with high mortality, morbidity, and costs. We compared patient populations, treatment, and survival of serious thoracic injuries in southern Finland and Germany. Mortality, patient characteristics and treatment modalities were compared over time (2006-2015) in all patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) thorax ≥ 3, Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, age > 15 years, blunt trauma mechanism, and treatment in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Level 1 hospitals included in the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR) and the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU). We included 934 patients from HTR and 25 448 patients from TR-DGU. Pre-hospital differences were seen between HTR and TR-DGU; transportation in the presence of a physician in 61% vs. 97%, helicopter use in 2% vs. 42%, intubation in 31% vs. 55%, and thoracostomy in 6% vs. 10% of cases, respectively. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) and ICU LOS was shorter in HTR vs. TR-DGU (13 vs. 25 days and 9 vs. 12 days, respectively). Our main outcome measure, standardised mortality ratio, was not statistically significantly different [1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.18; HTR and 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00; TR-DGU]. Major differences were seen in pre-hospital resources and use of pre-hospital intubation and thoracostomy. In Germany, pre-hospital intubation, tube thoracostomy, and on-scene physicians were more prevalent, while patients stayed longer in ICU and in hospital compared to Finland. Despite these differences in resources and treatment modalities, the standardised mortality of these patients was not statistically different.