Abstract

Shell and habitat utilization are quantified for 12 hermit crab species occurring subtidally in the San Juan Archipelago, Washington. The mechanism of competition for shells between these species is investigated using laboratory experiments to determine shell preferences, shell acquisition rates, and rates of exchange of shells via shell fighting. This information is used to estimate relative intensities of inter- and intra-specific competition for shells between the species in this assemblage. In contrast to earlier findings on intertidal hermit crab assemblages, a significant number (5) of the species in this assemblage appear to experience a greater reduction in their shell supply due to members of other species than due to other members of their own species. The relative amounts of inter- and intra-specific competition differ greatly for different species in the community. The high average figures for interspecific/intraspecific competition are largely a result of the presence of three abundant and very generalized species. In spite of the large number of species and relatively high ratios of interspecific to intraspecific competition, the species in this group are not close to a limiting similarity in resource use. There is suggestive evidence that greater selection pressures for divergence in habitat use may have resulted in the lower amounts of overlap observed in intertidal hermit crab assemblages in previous studies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.