Abstract

Allocating resources between population size and replication affects both genetic gain through phenotypic selection and quantitative trait loci detection power and effect estimation accuracy for marker-assisted selection (MAS). It is well known that because alleles are replicated across individuals in quantitative trait loci mapping and MAS, more resources should be allocated to increasing population size compared with phenotypic selection. Genomic selection is a form of MAS using all marker information simultaneously to predict individual genetic values for complex traits and has widely been found superior to MAS. No studies have explicitly investigated how resource allocation decisions affect success of genomic selection. My objective was to study the effect of resource allocation on response to MAS and genomic selection in a single biparental population of doubled haploid lines by using computer simulation. Simulation results were compared with previously derived formulas for the calculation of prediction accuracy under different levels of heritability and population size. Response of prediction accuracy to resource allocation strategies differed between genomic selection models (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction [RR-BLUP], BayesCπ) and multiple linear regression using ordinary least-squares estimation (OLS), leading to different optimal resource allocation choices between OLS and RR-BLUP. For OLS, it was always advantageous to maximize population size at the expense of replication, but a high degree of flexibility was observed for RR-BLUP. Prediction accuracy of doubled haploid lines included in the training set was much greater than of those excluded from the training set, so there was little benefit to phenotyping only a subset of the lines genotyped. Finally, observed prediction accuracies in the simulation compared well to calculated prediction accuracies, indicating these theoretical formulas are useful for making resource allocation decisions.

Highlights

  • Allocating resources between population size and replication affects both genetic gain through phenotypic selection and quantitative trait loci detection power and effect estimation accuracy for marker-assisted selection (MAS)

  • It is well known that power and precision of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker effect estimation is greatly influenced by population size and heritability (Yu et al 2008; Beavis 1994; Gimelfarb and Lande 1994; Schon et al 2004)

  • Many studies on genomic selection in plants have been performed using deterministic calculations (Heffner et al 2010), simulations (Bernardo and Yu 2007; Zhong et al 2009; Jannink 2010), and empirical results (Lorenzana and Bernardo 2009; Heffner et al, 2011; Lorenz et al 2012), but none have explicitly investigated the effect of experimental resource allocation choices during model development on total genetic gain and accuracy of genomic selection models for predicting genetic value of progenies at least one generation of recombination removed from the training population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Allocating resources between population size and replication affects both genetic gain through phenotypic selection and quantitative trait loci detection power and effect estimation accuracy for marker-assisted selection (MAS). Knapp and Bridges (1990) analyzed the expected mean squares of a model describing the sources of variation included in a QTL mapping experiment with replicated progenies and calculated power of QTL detection for different resource allocation strategies, not considering the cost of genotyping. Many studies on genomic selection in plants have been performed using deterministic calculations (Heffner et al 2010), simulations (Bernardo and Yu 2007; Zhong et al 2009; Jannink 2010), and empirical results (Lorenzana and Bernardo 2009; Heffner et al, 2011; Lorenz et al 2012), but none have explicitly investigated the effect of experimental resource allocation choices during model development on total genetic gain and accuracy of genomic selection models for predicting genetic value of progenies at least one generation of recombination removed from the training population. Results from simulations are compared to predictions made using available theoretical formulas

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call