Abstract
The lack of acceptance of grammatical opinions on all sides gave enough room for grammarians to use different arguments to respond to them, so they varied and differed according to different rulings. It was approved that responding to cases of definitive response does not rely on the possibility. Some of the conclusions are related to the corruption of the meaning, while the other part came to be related to the issue of the worker, the delay and presentation, and breaching the origin of grammar. Therefore, relying on the argumentative approach is an important matter for grammarians in a sense that it led them to the sharpness of intelligence, breadth of thought, and audacity of expression, building communication in speech between the speaker and the addressee, as well as achieving the benefit from it.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Journal of Tikrit university for humanities - مجلة جامعة تكريت للعلوم الانسانية
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
