Resolving taphonomic and preparation biases in silicified faunas through paired acid residues and X-ray microscopy.

Abstract

Paired petrography and acid maceration has shown that preferential silicification of shelly faunas can bias recovery based on taxon and body size. Here, silicified fossils from the Upper Ordovician Edinburg Formation, Strasburg Junction, Virginia, USA, were analyzed using X-ray tomographic microscopy (μCT) in conjunction with recovered residues from acid maceration of the same materials to further examine sources of potential bias. Results reveal that very small (<~1 mm) fossils are poorly resolved in μCT when scanning at lower resolutions (~30 µm), underestimating abundance of taxa including ostracods and bryozoans. Acid maceration, meanwhile, fails to recover poorly silicified fossils prone to disarticulation and/or fragmentation during digestion. Tests for patterns of breakage, however, indicate no significant size or taxonomic bias during extraction. Comparisons of individual fossils from 3-D fossil renders and maceration residues reveal patterns of fragmentation that are taxon-specific and allow the differentiation of biostratinomic and preparational breakage. Multivariate ordinations and cluster analyses of μCT and residue data in general produce concordant results but indicate that the variation in taxonomic composition of our samples is compromised by the resolvability of small size classes in μCT imaging, limiting the utility of this method for addressing paleoecological questions in these specific samples. We suggest that comparability of results will depend strongly on the sample size, taphonomic history, textural, and compositional characteristics of the samples in question, as well as μCT scan parameters. Additionally, applying these methods to different deposits will test the general applicability of the conclusions drawn on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the methods.