Abstract
Abstract. In hydrological modeling, model structures are developed in an iterative cycle as more and different types of measurements become available and our understanding of the hillslope or watershed improves. However, with increasing complexity of the model, it becomes more and more difficult to detect which parts of the model are deficient, or which processes should also be incorporated into the model during the next development step. In this study, we first compare two methods (the Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm (SCEM-UA) and the Simultaneous parameter Optimization and Data Assimilation algorithm (SODA)) to calibrate a purposely deficient 3-D hillslope-scale model to error-free, artificially generated measurements. We use a multi-objective approach based on distributed pressure head at the soil–bedrock interface and hillslope-scale discharge and water balance. For these idealized circumstances, SODA's usefulness as a diagnostic methodology is demonstrated by its ability to identify the timing and location of processes that are missing in the model. We show that SODA's state updates provide information that could readily be incorporated into an improved model structure, and that this type of information cannot be gained from parameter estimation methods such as SCEM-UA. We then expand on the SODA result by performing yet another calibration, in which we investigate whether SODA's state updating patterns are still capable of providing insight into model structure deficiencies when there are fewer measurements, which are moreover subject to measurement noise. We conclude that SODA can help guide the discussion between experimentalists and modelers by providing accurate and detailed information on how to improve spatially distributed hydrologic models.
Highlights
Our understanding of hillslope and watershed hydrology is typically summarized in numerical models
We argue that an analysis of how the a priori estimates are updated may yield valuable information about the appropriateness of the model structure: if there are no apparent patterns in the updating, the model structure is as good as the data allow
The aim of our study is to demonstrate that, when a model does not have the correct structure given the data, 1. parameter estimation may yield residual patterns in which the origin of the error is obscured due to compensation effects; 2. combining parameter estimation with ensemble Kalman filtering provides accurate and specific information that can readily be applied to improve the model structure
Summary
Our understanding of hillslope and watershed hydrology is typically summarized in numerical models. A similar approach was taken in Sieber and Uhlenbrook (2005), who used linear regression to analyze how parameter sensitivity varied over simulated time and in relation to additional variables This allowed them to make inferences about the appropriateness of the model structure and provided insight into when certain model parameters were relevant and when they were not. Subsequent analysis of when certain cluster members were dominant, combined with the (in)sensitivity of the parameters at that time, proved useful in determining the appropriateness or otherwise of certain model components, as well as in distinguishing between data error and model structure error. By using artificially generated measurements, we avoid any issues related to accuracy and precision of field measurements, as well as any issues related to incommensurability of field measurements and their model counterparts
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.