Abstract

Kinesins are well known to power diverse long-range transport processes in virtually all eukaryotic cells. The ATP-dependent processive stepping as well as the regulation of kinesin' activity have, thus, been the focus of extensive studies over the past decades. It is widely accepted that kinesin motors can self-regulate their activity by suppressing the catalytic activity of the "heads." The distal random coil at the C terminus, termed "tail domain," is proposed to mediate this autoinhibition; however, a direct regulatory influence of the tail on the processive stepping of kinesin proved difficult to capture. Here, we simultaneously tracked the two distinct head domains in the kinesin-2 motor using dual-color super resolution microscopy (dcFIONA) and reveal for the first time their individual properties during processive stepping. We show that the autoinhibitory wild-type conformation selectively impacts one head in the heterodimer but not the other. Our results provide insights into the regulated kinesin stepping that had escaped experimental scrutiny so far.

Highlights

  • Maintenance of a eukaryotic cell is a daunting task of logistics

  • The motor is propelled by the energy provided by two alternating ATP hydrolysis cycles in the so-called “head” domains [7, 8]

  • To follow the two head domains independently, we introduced SNAP- and Halo-tags at the N termini of the KLP11/20 heterodimer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maintenance of a eukaryotic cell is a daunting task of logistics. One key organizer of the eukaryotic cytoplasm is kinesin, a microtubuleassociated molecular motor that transports cargo in diverse settings throughout the cell [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The capability to extract information simultaneously from both heads confirmed the previously suggested limping behavior as well as the inhibitory impact of the tail domain on the stepping of the kinesin motor. The dwell times for kinesin constructs that were labeled on one head only were shown to be distributed according to a convolution of two exponentials [7, 21].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.