Resolving discrepancies between theory and experiment for the NCN + H reaction

Abstract

Flame modeling studies have highlighted the role of branching in the kinetics for the prompt NO switch reaction, NCN + H. In this reaction, there is strong competition between the CH + N2 (R1) and HCN + N (R2) product channels. Increased branching towards reaction R2 promotes the subsequent formation of Fenimore or Prompt NO. Recent direct shock tube studies on this complex reaction conclude that branching to reaction R2 is much more favorable than the predicted branching from theoretical studies. The experimentally predicted prompt NO switch temperature (TS), i.e., the temperature at which k2/(k1+k2) = 0.5, is at 1670 K, in contrast to theory that predicts Ts > 3200 K. The present theory/modeling work was initiated to highlight potential causes for this significant discrepancy between experiment and theory. Our analysis of the simulations reported in the experimental studies indicate that including a fall-off representation for C2H5 radical dissociation (with C2H5 produced from C2H5I dissociation and acting as an H-atom source) has a noticeable influence on the simulations for NCN decay and HCN formation in the shock tube studies. With the inclusion of a theory-based pressure fall-off representation for C2H5 dissociation, we show that this radical persists for much longer timescales even at the high-temperatures in the shock tube studies. This persistence then facilitates the rapid conversion of reactive H-atoms to CH3 radicals at the shock tube conditions via the H + C2H5 → CH3 + CH3 reaction. An updated theoretical analysis for this classic addition-elimination reaction is also provided in this work. The rapid formation of CH3 radicals necessitates the inclusion of additional reactions to adequately simulate the NCN and HCN data. Our simulations conclude that, with the inclusion of these additional reactions, the NCN and HCN profiles can be reasonably well simulated by the most recent theoretical predictions.