Abstract

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation is the most important risk factor for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi, a potentially life‐threatening condition. Thrombus resolution may prevent embolic events and allow rhythm‐control strategies, which have been shown to reduce cardiovascular complications.HypothesisThere is no significant difference between phenprocoumon and non‐Vitamin K‐dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the resolution of LAA‐thrombi in a real‐world setting.MethodsConsecutive patients with LAA‐thrombi from June 2013 to June 2017 were included in an observational single‐center analysis. The primary endpoint was defined as the resolution of the thrombus. The observational period was 1 year. Resolutions rates in patients on phenprocoumon or NOACs were compared and the time to resolution was analyzed.ResultsWe identified 114 patients with LAA‐thrombi. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of resolution between phenprocoumon and NOACs (p = .499) at the time of first control which took place after a mean of 58 ± 42.2 (median 48) days. At first control most thrombi were dissolved (74.6%). The analysis after set‐time intervals revealed a resolution rate of 2/3 of LAA‐thrombi after 8–10 weeks in the phenprocoumon and NOAC groups. After 12 weeks a higher number of thrombi had resolved in the presence of NOAC (89.3%) whereas in the presence of phenprocoumon 68.3% had resolved (p = .046).ConclusionIn this large observational study NOACs were found to be potent drugs for the resolution of LAA‐thrombi. In addition, the resolution of LAA‐thrombi was found to be faster in the presence of NOAC as compared to phenprocoumon.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.