Abstract

Three different types of frequency response estimators are considered and compared with each other with respect to the inherent resolution bias errors. The behavior of these estimators is shown to differ considerably, especially with respect to peak estimation in resonance systems such as a simple spring-mass system. One of these estimators is shown to exhibit almost no peak bias error at resonance under noise-free measurement conditions whereas the peak bias error of the estimator most commonly used is maximum. However, aside from resonance, the peak-bias-free estimator proves to be the worst of the three estimators. The theoretical predictions are accurately verified by experiments with an electrical LRC-resonance circuit.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.