Abstract
SummaryWhilst “resistant starch” has both the analytical and, arguably the physiological properties of “dietary fibre”, detailed aspects of its properties have been cited as reasons for excluding it from total fibre for labelling purposes. Do these difficulties add up to a damning indictment or not? A protagonist of one side of the argument throws some new light on the properties of resistant starch, and invites readers to draw their own conclusions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
