Resistance to Echinocandins in Candida Can Be Detected by Performing the Etest Directly on Blood Culture Samples.

Abstract

We examined the rapid evaluation of susceptibility to echinocandins in Candida spp. using the Etest performed directly on positive blood cultures and anidulafungin-containing agar plates. We prospectively collected 80 positive blood cultures (Bactec-FX system, Becton-Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD, USA) with echinocandin-susceptible Candida spp. (n = 60) and echinocandin-intermediate Candida parapsilosis (n = 20) from patients with candidemia. Additionally, blood culture bottles of nonfungemic/bacteremic patients were spiked with 35 echinocandin-resistant Candida species isolates. A total of 2 to 4 drops of medium from each bottle were stroked directly onto both RPMI 1640 agar plates with micafungin and anidulafungin Etest strips (ETDIR) and Sabouraud agar plates containing 2 mg/liter of anidulafungin. The isolates were tested according to the EUCAST method and Etest standard (ETSD). Essential and categorical agreement between the methods was calculated. The essential agreement and categorical agreement between the EUCAST method and ETDIR and ETSD were both >97.4%. The essential agreement between ETDIR and the EUCAST method for both echinocandins was >97%. The categorical agreement between the FKS sequence and ETDIR was 97.4%. The ETDIR MICs of anidulafungin and micafungin (≥0.19 mg/liter and ≥0.064 mg/liter, respectively) effectively separated all susceptible FKS wild-type isolates from the resistant FKS mutant isolates. The categorical agreement (62.6%) between the EUCAST method and growth on anidulafungin-containing plates was poor, with the best agreement observed for Candida glabrata (94.2%). When performed directly on positive blood cultures from patients with candidemia, the Etest with micafungin and anidulafungin is a reliable procedure for the rapid testing of susceptibility to echinocandins in Candida species isolates.