Abstract
Summary Frequency distributions of log‐scaled abundance and body size for aquatic biota, including fish, yield size spectra that provide gross estimates of food‐web capacity (number of individuals supported by the food web indexed by the midpoint height or y‐intercept) and ecological efficiency (rate of decreasing organismal abundance with increasing body size as indicated by the size‐spectra slope). Size spectra are known to respond in predictable fashion to exploitation by commercial (marine) fisheries, but there has been relatively little research of size spectra in freshwater systems and less evaluation of how community size‐structure responds to the wider array of ecological perturbations prevalent in freshwater systems. We used a 29‐year experimental gillnet data set to test the responses of food‐web capacity and ecological efficiency (as indexed by size spectra) of a large river fish community to variations in predatory demand (population expansion of double‐crested cormorant, Phalacrocorax auritus) and perturbations affecting primary production (reductions in total phosphorus and warming summer water temperature). Fish community capacity (size‐spectra elevation) and ecological efficiency (size‐spectra slope) showed low interannual variation (coefficients of variation 5.6 and 15.4%, respectively). Though highly stable, food‐web capacity decreased over time concurrent with declining total phosphorus concentrations and increasing cormorant abundance. Interannual variation in ecological efficiency was not related to the measured perturbations. Relative abundance of the core species that comprised 95% of the community remained relatively consistent over time. The fish community size‐structure was also stable and resistant to ecological perturbation. However, we found measurable changes in the composition of secondary species, and these were associated with an increase in cormorant abundance and decrease in total phosphorus. The lack of change in core community species representation and in overall size structure suggest community‐level compensatory mechanisms were operating.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.