Abstract

In the recent decades, the use of geosynthetics to improve the overall soil’s bearing capacity and settlement behavior under shallow foundations has become a major topic. Despite several studies that have been carried out on Reinforced Soil Foundations (RSF), no design specifications have been set to design RSF against the Ultimate and Serviceability Limit State (ULS and SLS) in any of the established codes. This paper presents the development of resistance factors based on the Load and Resistance Factor design (LRFD) approach against the ULS and SLS for strip footing resting on C−ϕ soils. The resistance factors are developed using a spreadsheet-based reliability model based on the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) to be consistent with the ASCE-7 load factors. The resistance factors are calibrated at a targeted probability failure (Pf) of 0.13499% and 0.00317% for ULS and 2.27%, for SLS. A Finite Element Model (FEM) is developed to validate three analytical solutions to establish the reliability model. The FEM results showed an agreement with the analytical solutions. For ULS the developed resistance factors at Pf= 0.13499% ranged from 0.33 to 0.9 assuming lognormally distributed variables and 0.25 to 0.89 assuming normally distributed variables. The resistance factors against SLS at Pf= 2.27%. ranged from 0.39 to 0.85 considering lognormally distributed variables and 0.35 to 0.83 considering normally distributed variables.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.