Abstract

Prediabetes is a highly prevalent precursor to type 2 diabetes, and is also associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Resistance exercise (RE) is an effective method of reducing cardiometabolic risk factors in persons with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, but its efficacy in individuals with prediabetes is unclear. Determining the cardiometabolic impact of RE in prediabetes is necessary for evidence-based exercise prescription for diabetes prevention. PURPOSE: To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized control trials examining the effect of RE on cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals with prediabetes. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for published studies of adults at risk for diabetes and who participated in a RE intervention. All studies included randomized or non-randomized control trials. The database search and data extraction were performed by two separate reviewers. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine changes in adiposity, glycemic control, insulin resistance, blood lipids/lipoproteins, and blood pressure (BP) following the interventions using a random effects model to assess standardized mean differences (SMD) between RE and control. RESULTS: 10 studies comprising 404 participants were included in the analysis. For RE compared to controls, there were significant improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin (SMD = -0.688; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.178 to -0.198; p=0.006), fasting plasma glucose (SMD = -0.747; 95% CI -1.003 to -0.460; p<0.001), and total cholesterol (SMD = -0.723; 95% CI -1.177 to -0.27; p=0.002). No changes in waist circumference (SMD = -0.232, 95% CI -.526 to 0.062; p=0.122), insulin resistance (SMD = -0.597, 95% CI -1.65 to 0.457; p=0.267), high-density lipoprotein (SMD = -0.287, 95% CI -0.748 to 0.174; p=0.223) or low-density lipoprotein (SMD = -0.398, 95% CI -1.027 to 0.231; p=0.215) cholesterol, triglycerides (SMD = -0.400, 95% CI -0.850 to 0.050; p=0.081), systolic BP (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI -0.491 to 0.158; p=0.315), or diastolic BP (-0.476, 95% CI -1.05 to 0.105; p=0.108) were found. CONCLUSION: RE appears to be an effective method of improving glucose control, but is less effective in improving blood lipids or blood pressure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call