Abstract

This paper demonstrates that resistance–capacitance models provide equal results than models based on finite-element software when predicting the performance of a thermoelectric module under transient-state conditions. Previous papers on this topic fall short as comparing finite-element models with simplified versions of resistance–capacitance models.It was confirmed that resistance–capacitance models replicate results of finite-element models in the simulation of a thermoelectric module under steady-state conditions. Deviations lower than 3 % in electric power and efficiency (ratio of electric power to heat input) are obtained for temperature differences between heat source and heat sink as large as 200 K.Similarly, deviations lower than 3 % are obtained for simulation of a thermoelectric module under transient-state conditions. Resistance-capacitance models not only replicate values, trends and rates of variation predicted by finite-element models under step, linear and sinewave variations in the boundary conditions, but they also do this with negligible computational cost.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.