Abstract

Recent advances in high-speed computing, combined with the emergence of artificial neural network (ANN) techniques for the analysis of large data sets, has enabled researchers to provide the design community with higher-resolution mathematical models (MMs) for existing test data. Presently, one of the most popular planing hull prediction methods for resistance and trim are based on regressions of the Series 62 database. New MMs developed here address two major shortcomings of the original approaches; first, the equations are now continuous functions of volumetric Froude number (rather than separate regressions for each speed), and second, MM for trim is much more accurate, enabling designers to identify the double hump in trim that is associated with dynamic instabilities at higher speeds. This work describes the derivation of MMs for calm water resistance and running trim angle corresponding to volume Froude numbers of 1.0–4.0, and includes not only the original David Taylor Model Basin Series 62 data for 12.5° deadrise, but also the later extensions made by Delft University of Technology, including 25° and 30° deadrise. Part 1 of this research, published separately, explains the streamlining of the foundational database—how outliers are identified, and methods to provide a database from which stable MM can be developed. The present article, Part 2, deals with the derivation of the actual mathematical model. Two ANN techniques were used, with single output, which has been applied to similar problems in the past, and with multiple output, which is a new approach to the problem. The results of the two different methods, both developing satisfactory models, are discussed and compared. 1. Introduction The primary objective of this article is to derive mathematical models (MMs) for calculation of calm water resistance and dynamic trim angle (τ) within the speed range corresponding to volume Froude numbers (Fn∇) = 1.0–4.0 for the systematic hard chine, planing hull Series 62. Part 1, published separately, explains the methodology for establishing a database suitable for modeling, whereas this part deals with the derivation of adequate MMs. Namely, Series 62 originally consisted of five models of 12.5° deadrise tested at the David Taylor Model Basin. Later, models of 25° and 30° deadrise were tested by Delft University of Technology (DUT) - see Keuning and Geritsma (1982) and Keuning et al. (1993). The accumulation of test data developed over a 30-year period by multiple research institutions provided a considerable challenge to organize and form a database from.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.