Abstract
Bark beetle outbreaks frequently kill large areas of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Resin production is the main defense against these insects and resin duct metrics and areas are correlated with both resin flow and tree survival post bark beetle attack. Whether the number, area, or size of resin ducts is increase when trees grow faster or whether there is a tradeoff between tree growth and resin ducts is currently debated. We determined the impacts of water availability (ambient vs 30 % throughfall reduction), nutrient availability (fertilized vs non-fertilized), and thinning on vertical resin duct count (ducts per 5 mm strip of annual ring), density (ducts mm−2), area (duct area per 5 mm strip of annual ring), relative area (% duct area per ring), and average duct size (mm−2) in planted stands of loblolly pine (ages 6–13) in southeastern Oklahoma. Fertilization increased diameter growth (10 %) and metrics that scale to ring width, i.e., duct count (15 %) and duct area (22 %), but also duct relative area (8 %). Throughfall exclusion decreased diameter growth and duct count in some years, increased duct density, and reduced duct average size (8 %). The net effect was that fertilized stands with ambient water availability had the greatest resource availability among treatments in this study and had the greatest duct count, duct area, and duct relative area as well as average duct size greater than the throughfall exclusion treatments. During the post thinning period, i.e., ages 10–13, thinning increased diameter growth from 9.63 to 12.05 mm year−1, duct count from 9.69 to 12.22, duct area from 0.384 to 0.514 mm2, duct relative area from 1.67 % to 1.84 %, and average duct size from 0.0396 to 0.0428 mm2. Earlywood composed approximately 2/3 of the annual ring, but latewood had almost 5 times greater duct density such that there were more ducts and greater duct areas in the latewood. Our assessment of duct metrics provides a link between tree growth rate, resource availability, and duct metrics associated with resistance to bark beetles. Therefore, silvicultural practices used to increase tree growth likely also increase resistance to bark beetles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.