Abstract

There is widespread recognition that stressors related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) jeopardize the development of emerging adults, more particularly those living in disadvantaged communities. What is less well understood is what might support emerging adult resilience to COVID-19-related stressors. In response, this article reports a 5-week qualitative study with 24 emerging adults (average age: 20) living in a South African township. Using digital diaries and repeated individual interviews, young people shared their lived experiences of later (i.e., month 4 and 7) lockdown-related challenges (i.e., contagion fears; livelihood threats; lives-on-hold) and how they managed these challenges. An inductive thematic analysis showed that personal and collective compliance, generous ways-of-being, and tolerance-facilitators enabled emerging adult resilience to said challenges. Importantly, these resilience-enablers drew on resources associated with multiple systems and reflected the situational and cultural context of the township in question. In short, supporting emerging adult resilience to COVID-19-related stressors will require contextually aligned, multisystemic responses.

Highlights

  • On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organisation announced a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

  • We identified a single systematic review of emerging adult resilience studies [27]

  • Our attention to participants’ understandings fits social constructivist reservations about universal truths [33]. It fits the complexity of human resilience [23, 24], and the calls for resilience accounts informed by young people themselves [34]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organisation announced a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Their announcement signalled that countries must actively manage extensive community transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 [1]. That lockdown, described as “one of the most rigid and extreme lockdowns announced anywhere in the world” [3], curbed the spread of the coronavirus. Still, it was associated with widespread psychological and economic suffering that was skewed towards South Africa’s most disadvantaged people [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call