Abstract

Residual stresses are an inescapable consequence of manufacturing and fabrication processes, with magnitudes that are often a high proportion of the yield or proof strength. Despite this, their incorporation into life prediction is primarily handled through sweeping assumptions or conservative application of statistics. This can lead to highly conservative fatigue design methodologies or unforeseen failures under dynamic loading. The pull from the desire for higher levels of materials performance, coupled with the push of more sophisticated techniques for residual stress measurement, favours a reassessment of the accuracy of assumptions made about residual stresses and their modification during fatigue cycling. A viewpoint is also emerging that the fatigue performance of welded joints might be optimised through careful process control, coupled with understanding of the relative positions of, and interaction between, residual stress peaks, weld defects, hardness and microstructure. This paper will present information regarding the residual stress profiles in aluminium and steel welds, and in shot peened aluminium, obtained via synchrotron and neutron diffraction at the ESRF-ILL in Grenoble. Certain specimens were then subjected to specific cases of fatigue loading and the residual stress field was again measured. Difficulties associated with determining the strain-free lattice spacing will be mentioned, and the potential import of these data for life prediction modelling will be considered.

Highlights

  • Life prediction for components and structures is widely deemed to be a mature field, in the sense that the underlying fracture mechanics is well understood, as are the principles of a defect tolerant approach to fatigue lifing

  • A large part of this uncertainty arises from the presence of residual stresses

  • The presence of residual stresses is known to affect both initiation and growth of fatigue cracks, through changes to the effective mean stress experienced during fatigue cycling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Life prediction for components and structures is widely deemed to be a mature field, in the sense that the underlying fracture mechanics is well understood, as are the principles of a defect tolerant approach to fatigue lifing. The presence of residual stresses is known to affect both initiation and growth of fatigue cracks, through changes to the effective mean stress experienced during fatigue cycling.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.