Residual stress of porcelain-fused to zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses measured by nanoindentation

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the residual stress (nanoindentation based on hardness) of fatigued porcelain-fused to zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with different framework designs. MethodsTwenty maxillary 3-unit FDP replacing second-premolar (pontic) were fabricated with conventional framework-design (even-thickness of 0.5mm and 9mm2 connector area) and modified framework-design (thickness of 0.5mm presenting lingual collar connected to proximal struts and 12mm2 connector area). Connector marginal ridges were loaded and the fractured and suspended FDPs were divided (n=3/each) into: (1) Fractured zirconia even-thickness (ZrEvenF); (2) Suspended zirconia even-thickness (ZrEvenS); (3) Fractured zirconia with modified framework (ZrModF); (4) Suspended zirconia with modified framework (ZrModS); (5) Non-fatigued FDP with conventional framework design (Control). The FDPs were nanoindented at 0.03mm (Region of Interest (ROI) 1), 0.35mm (ROI 2) and 1.05mm (ROI 3) distances from porcelain veneer outer surface with peak load 4000μN. The Linear Mixed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Model on ranks and Least Significant Difference Test on ranks (95%) were used. ResultsHighest rank hardness values were found for Control group and ZrModS, whereas the lowest values were found in ZrModF. Statistical differences (p=0.000) were found among all groups except for comparison between ZrModS and Control group (p=0.371). Hardness between ROIs were statistically significant different (p<0.001) where ROI 1 presented the lowest values. SignificanceFramework-design modification did not influence the residual stress of porcelain-fused to zirconia fatigued 3-unit FDP. Whereas fractured FDPs showed the highest residual stress compared to suspended and control FDPs. Residual stress increased as nanoindented away from framework.