Abstract

Background and aimsThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that Internal Medicine residents shall place all the orders for their patients. The purpose of this rule is to assure comprehensive knowledge of patient information and direct involvement in decision-making. However, there is a general perception that a large proportion of orders for patients taken care of by the residents are being written by consultants or other providers. The objective of the study was to determine the proportion of routine orders placed by Internal Medicine residents in comparison to consultants/subspecialty providers for patients under the care of the Internal Medicine Residency Service (IMRS). Material and methodsAll the orders on patients admitted to the IMRS at AdventHealth Orlando from July 9, 2017, to July 15, 2017, were documented. Of these, Emergency Department (ED) orders, “STAT/ASAP/NOW orders,” “discharge by consultant” orders, and “consent for procedure” orders were excluded. The main outcome measure was the proportion of orders placed by Internal Medicine residents as compared to consultants and all other providers.ResultsA total of 6471 orders placed on 90 patients admitted to the IMRS and with at least one consultant were included in the study. Of them, 96.8% of all orders were placed by Internal Medicine residents. Only 3.1% of all orders were placed by consultants and other providers. Of them, the majority of the orders were specialty-specific orders and were appropriate. Only 1.1% of all orders were “routine” orders placed inappropriately by consultants and other providers. A total of 121 consultations were made, and there were no new consultations initiated by consultants and other providers during the study period.ConclusionThe vast majority of orders for patients taken care of by the IMRS were placed by the Internal Medicine residents themselves. Only a very small proportion of the orders were placed by consultants and other providers in this limited timeframe study. The findings are consistent with the ACGME mandate that residents write all orders for patients under their care except in special circumstances.

Highlights

  • The use of the electronic health record (EHR) has become increasingly common in US medical institutions [1]

  • A total of 6471 orders placed on 90 patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Residency Service (IMRS) and with at least one consultant were included in the study

  • 96.8% of all orders were placed by Internal Medicine residents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of the electronic health record (EHR) has become increasingly common in US medical institutions [1]. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residents should write all routine orders for patients admitted under their care, with appropriate supervision by the attending physician [5]. This ensures resident autonomy and involvement in the care of the patient. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that Internal Medicine residents shall place all the orders for their patients. The purpose of this rule is to assure comprehensive knowledge of patient information and direct involvement in decision-making. The objective of the study was to determine the proportion of routine orders placed by Internal Medicine residents in comparison to consultants/subspecialty providers for patients under the care of the Internal Medicine Residency Service (IMRS)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.